or .. a case of you don't understand till it happens to you?
The Ditmar Natcon Committee have deemed it necessary to redo the ballot for the 2006 Ditmars.
If you look carefully, I have been dropped from 2 of the 3 shortlistings I was in and one whole category has been removed - best fan achievement. I'd like to know why I wasn't eligible for that category. You'd think that a popularist awards system would be bound to the popularist vote.
Now it might be a case of being too tired since I haven't slept much this week or a perceived run of bad internet luck but .. I'm gonna have to switch sides on the Ditmar argument and move to the Dark
benpeek side.
What a bunch of unprofessionals - that they didn't check the ballot properly before they released it. Because I can tell ya .. kinda feels like a nice swift kick in the gut to see your name being the only one removed from a category.
Just as well awards don't mean shit, eh!
The Ditmar Natcon Committee have deemed it necessary to redo the ballot for the 2006 Ditmars.
If you look carefully, I have been dropped from 2 of the 3 shortlistings I was in and one whole category has been removed - best fan achievement. I'd like to know why I wasn't eligible for that category. You'd think that a popularist awards system would be bound to the popularist vote.
Now it might be a case of being too tired since I haven't slept much this week or a perceived run of bad internet luck but .. I'm gonna have to switch sides on the Ditmar argument and move to the Dark
What a bunch of unprofessionals - that they didn't check the ballot properly before they released it. Because I can tell ya .. kinda feels like a nice swift kick in the gut to see your name being the only one removed from a category.
Just as well awards don't mean shit, eh!
- Mood:disappointed


Comments
I know from sideline involvement in the similar process over here with the similar Sir Julius Vogel's that there is a lot of pushing and pulling around categories and things do get moved and dropped. But never after public release - that is just wrong.
However it feels pretty crap to be the only person to have your name removed from a category after they tell you people voted to put it there. And done so publicly as well. Ostracised is kinda how it feels.
I guess I'd rather have no nominations at all than have some taken away from me as though I've done something wrong.
I guess more than that, I object to the lack of professionalism in that - it takes away from them giving away "professional" verses "fan" awards and also, it reduces their own credibility. And that was something I guess I was originally defending.
*giggle* plus I figured out your real name from looking at the noms... not that you wouldn't have told me if I'd just asked
Umm, how can nobody be eligible for the Fan Achievement award?
I have emailed the convenors to as why I was not considered eligible on retrospect, I will update as soon as I know more.
Second, I am going to say that I am part of the committee that suggested the changes to the ballot. That doesn't mean I agreed with all the changes personally, but I am in a position to explain the changes. I can say there was no bias or personal intent, and all changes were made after discussion between a whole committee. Changes were made on the basis of eligibility only - imagine if a large number of people had nominated a short story for novel, should we leave the story in the wrong category just because that was the popular choice for nomination? Decisions were made with similar reasoning.
The reason why you aren't eligible for fan achievement is very simple. The fan achievement category is defined in the rules as being for achievements 'not eligible in existing categories'. So, if you are eligible for fan production, you are therefore logically not eligible for fan achievement.
I know its disappointing.
I wasn't aware that Ben had much against the Ditmars, his beef was with the AAs I thought. The Ditmars are run by fans, and in this case they are being run by fans who have never done it before. Its a screw up, but they are in a difficult position.
Many thanks for explaining the changes.
I don't know if that happened here, but if nominations have just been thrown out because of confusion, I think you have grounds for complaint.
The one exception is Justine Larbaliester for Best New Talent. She simply isn't eligible for Best New Talent, as while its her first fiction nomination, she was nominated for professional awards for her non-fiction, and the Best New Talent award doesn't distinguish between fiction and non-fiction (or editing, or art, etc).
The system you describe, where nominations for the wrong category are moved to the right category, is the normal one.
The short story vs novel was just to illustrate that the correct category is the correct category no matter what the vote - some of the mistakes made were not so obvious, and were missed.
actually, i don't have anything against the ditmars. the problems that exist in it have existed for such a long time that i just kinda view them as being part of the award (by this i mean the block voting). but i did think it was a double standard to remain on them, given my opinion of the aurealis awards.
And by the way, Ticonderoga Online isn't a fanzine either! They pay for fiction.
Secondly, the whole handling of this situation has sucked. And I'm deeply disappointed because I want to take the scene seriously and you just can't when this kind of amateurism happens. It makes me think (in response to a comment above) that if the team is inexperienced, then perhaps the idea of the Past President being part of the new committee, as is done in most committees, should be considered.
Its very very very poor form.
Its a shame though that past presidents can't be involved - even remotely. Reinventing the wheel wastes time.
I actually don't see why its not Fan Production AND Fanzine, given what has been left in the categories.
And afterall, thats the kind of feedback that's the most desirable!
The removal of Fan achievement makes sense, as others have noted, if it's an award only for stuff that doesn't get recognised elsewhere. Will be interested to hear why it was dropped from the fanzine category though...
I doubt it was anything personal, though you're right to be miffed at the way it was handled...
but as others have said, you should be very proud to be on there... and you know, the fact that the site originally made the nominations for three different categories would seem to indicate it's pretty popular, to get enough support with a split vote!
I am proud so many people voted for me.
I just am saddened by the lack of professionality in the whole thing.
(When was the last time the best film of the year won the Oscars or the best album won a Grammy?)
It would be nice if there was courtesy shown to the names on the ballot which represent people - and that doesn't have anythign to do with experience. Mistakes happen. Its how you fix them that matters.