This is soon going to go on the ASif! forum in a new area for feedback or as we like to call it ... Letters to the Literary Stooges ... so I thought I might preview here for your enjoyment ... the kind of fanmail I receive, about weekly, as Executive Editor of ASif!
One might wonder what this author was hoping to achieve (note any amusing comments here may also find their way to the aforementioned new column). This letter was written in response to my reply to his first, whiny complaint about his review, that this his sort of response was unprofessional.
The point I made is that [ASif! Reviewer] is the type of person who likes to focus on the parsley garnish, rather than the truffle. The partial finger print on the glass that holds the Grange Hermitage, making her not a natural critic of the grammatically imperfect [Book recently reviewed].
I feel, though, we have missed the important point. That being there are only two types of people in the world; people who have the talent, and courage, to commit themselves to a project. To extract the magic required in making their work special and unique.
Then there are the critics. Over-educated, fear ridden types, so full of other people's ideas they have never once held an original idea. They gather together in collections of the tortured, reading the works of others. Knowing with resigned certainty that they are destined to spend the remainder of their days watching life from the sidelines.
Please hold this thought close to your mind: The only reason writers bow before swine is to grab a comment for the back of their novels. You have absolutely no other purpose on this earth.
At least I can finish that soul searching quest for my reason for living - None.
Done.
Next?
One might wonder what this author was hoping to achieve (note any amusing comments here may also find their way to the aforementioned new column). This letter was written in response to my reply to his first, whiny complaint about his review, that this his sort of response was unprofessional.
The point I made is that [ASif! Reviewer] is the type of person who likes to focus on the parsley garnish, rather than the truffle. The partial finger print on the glass that holds the Grange Hermitage, making her not a natural critic of the grammatically imperfect [Book recently reviewed].
I feel, though, we have missed the important point. That being there are only two types of people in the world; people who have the talent, and courage, to commit themselves to a project. To extract the magic required in making their work special and unique.
Then there are the critics. Over-educated, fear ridden types, so full of other people's ideas they have never once held an original idea. They gather together in collections of the tortured, reading the works of others. Knowing with resigned certainty that they are destined to spend the remainder of their days watching life from the sidelines.
Please hold this thought close to your mind: The only reason writers bow before swine is to grab a comment for the back of their novels. You have absolutely no other purpose on this earth.
At least I can finish that soul searching quest for my reason for living - None.
Done.
Next?


Comments
*guffaw*
If I didn't know you better, I'd accuse you of making that up as a parody! :)
And we still have the second copy to review!
I'm just...
that's...
I mean...
Like how much of a writer is that guy?
Seriously dude... take a course on business english... that's like what you use in emails and letters for business purposes...
And I dont' know about you, but personally I have no intrest in Grange Hermatage at all. I dont' drink wine. I'd be pouring over the partial myself, looking at all the loops and worls, and carefully absconding with the soy sauce from the pantry in order to print your guests to find out who it belonged to... (PXC150)
He's a noone.
what a loser.
Wanker.
Even if "over-educated" is a pejorative, surely the opposite is "educated", not "uneducated". :)
I've read the latest ASif reviews, and while some of them have criticisms, I couldn't see any that warranted such condescension.
Was the book self-published?
It reminds me of when Roger Ebert trashed Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny, causing Gallo to launch into a hilariously over-the-top tirade about how useless and talentless Ebert apparently was, culminating in Gallo noting that Ebert had cancer and "would be dead soon anyway".
To which Ebert wisely noted that "Yes, I have cancer, and one day I shall be dead. But you, Mr Gallo, shall always be the director of The Brown Bunny."
It is a very sad view of the world, this letter. It disrespects me, who neither read his book nor wrote the review, it disrespects democracy and free thought, and well... it's very short term looking. I still don't know what was to be achieved here.
It's a great idea to publish these letters on ASif. Gimme more more more...
Just figuring out what I can write now for future response.
I don't think I've taken this too personally. I must admit that I do see things like this as moves in a chess board and, well, pawn takes queen, really.
(That's better)
Whereas this author's purpose is apparently to serve as an object lesson in ill-considered and unprofessional behaviour.
I can't even think of anything to say that hasn't been said already. I cannot believe that anyone would write that.
You really do get 'em, don't you?
I'm with Angriest. If you get a good review, smile and say thank you. If you get a bad one, say nothing. Because, really, how can you possibly win? You only come off looking like a wanker.
Are you aware Amazon now has a feature that allows authors to reply to reviews? I must say that so far the amusement value has not been quite what I was hoping for (Based on the Anne Rice incident).
I remember that whole Anne Rice incident. I really think the only reply you can ever leave for a review, good or bad, is "thanks for the review".
Your purpose in life is clearly to post these amusing gems for the rest of us to read.