Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Feedback

  • Oct. 18th, 2006 at 11:40 AM
Willow
This is soon going to go on the ASif! forum in a new area for feedback or as we like to call it ... Letters to the Literary Stooges ... so I thought I might preview here for your enjoyment ... the kind of fanmail I receive, about weekly, as Executive Editor of ASif!

One might wonder what this author was hoping to achieve (note any amusing comments here may also find their way to the aforementioned new column). This letter was written in response to my reply to his first, whiny complaint about his review, that this his sort of response was unprofessional.

The point I made is that [ASif! Reviewer] is the type of person who likes to focus on the parsley garnish, rather than the truffle. The partial finger print on the glass that holds the Grange Hermitage, making her not a natural critic of the grammatically imperfect [Book recently reviewed].

I feel, though, we have missed the important point. That being there are only two types of people in the world; people who have the talent, and courage, to commit themselves to a project. To extract the magic required in making their work special and unique.

Then there are the critics. Over-educated, fear ridden types, so full of other people's ideas they have never once held an original idea. They gather together in collections of the tortured, reading the works of others. Knowing with resigned certainty that they are destined to spend the remainder of their days watching life from the sidelines.

Please hold this thought close to your mind: The only reason writers bow before swine is to grab a comment for the back of their novels. You have absolutely no other purpose on this earth.


At least I can finish that soul searching quest for my reason for living - None.
Done.
Next?

Comments

[info]capnoblivious wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 03:52 am (UTC)
*snigger*
*guffaw*

If I didn't know you better, I'd accuse you of making that up as a parody! :)
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 03:54 am (UTC)
no. That's genuinely what i woke up to this morning.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 03:54 am (UTC)
It's one in a series.
[info]catsparx wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:00 am (UTC)
CHRIST ON A BIKE!!! What a loser. And an idiot to boot. Because it won't take long for that author's name to filter through the rest of the SF writing, reviewing, editing and publishing community.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:38 am (UTC)
And like the first one was kinda bad so I was like "you know, penning his is considered unprofessional" and I got this one back!

And we still have the second copy to review!
(no subject) - [info]catsparx - Oct. 18th, 2006 04:41 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 04:45 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 04:45 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]catsparx - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:35 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:42 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ozisim - Oct. 18th, 2006 09:09 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 20th, 2006 07:34 am (UTC) Expand
[info]ozisim wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:01 am (UTC)
*blinks*
I'm just...
that's...
I mean...
Like how much of a writer is that guy?
Seriously dude... take a course on business english... that's like what you use in emails and letters for business purposes...

And I dont' know about you, but personally I have no intrest in Grange Hermatage at all. I dont' drink wine. I'd be pouring over the partial myself, looking at all the loops and worls, and carefully absconding with the soy sauce from the pantry in order to print your guests to find out who it belonged to... (PXC150)
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:39 am (UTC)
And all I keep thinking is ... the yarn I could have bought instead of sending that book over to the reviewer!

He's a noone.
[info]benpeek wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:20 am (UTC)
hahahaha.

what a loser.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:39 am (UTC)
yep
[info]jack_ryder wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:22 am (UTC)
He uses over-educated as a pejorative.

Wanker.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 04:25 am (UTC)
Yeah I know. heh. *so* insulted!!
[info]devinjay wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 05:02 am (UTC)
And then forgets to hyphenate "fear-ridden".

Even if "over-educated" is a pejorative, surely the opposite is "educated", not "uneducated". :)
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:04 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]devinjay - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:07 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:10 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]devinjay - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:14 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:15 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]devinjay - Oct. 18th, 2006 05:20 am (UTC) Expand
[info]jiraiyac wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 05:07 am (UTC)
What a bizarre over-reaction to a review.

I've read the latest ASif reviews, and while some of them have criticisms, I couldn't see any that warranted such condescension.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 05:09 am (UTC)
one of those is the one.
[info]dsgood wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 05:23 am (UTC)
Badly written, particularly the two middle paragraphs. The rest suffers from nothing worse than bathos and overdecoration.

Was the book self-published?
[info]angriest wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 06:04 am (UTC)
As someone who's charted a course in both semi-pro and pro writing as simultaneously a creative writer and a critic, I'm rather insulted by the author's attitude.

It reminds me of when Roger Ebert trashed Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny, causing Gallo to launch into a hilariously over-the-top tirade about how useless and talentless Ebert apparently was, culminating in Gallo noting that Ebert had cancer and "would be dead soon anyway".

To which Ebert wisely noted that "Yes, I have cancer, and one day I shall be dead. But you, Mr Gallo, shall always be the director of The Brown Bunny."
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 06:06 am (UTC)
heh.

It is a very sad view of the world, this letter. It disrespects me, who neither read his book nor wrote the review, it disrespects democracy and free thought, and well... it's very short term looking. I still don't know what was to be achieved here.
(no subject) - [info]angriest - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:17 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:21 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]angriest - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:26 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 20th, 2006 07:42 am (UTC) Expand
[info]paulhaines wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 06:18 am (UTC)
I know it's hard to not to take these things personally, Alisa, but it is a pretty funny response.

It's a great idea to publish these letters on ASif. Gimme more more more...

Just figuring out what I can write now for future response.
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 06:23 am (UTC)
Ooh you could get angry at me for saying you might be misogynistic - we could have a total all out insult war - people will rush out to buy your book! Cept, the downside is, your writing isn't shit.

I don't think I've taken this too personally. I must admit that I do see things like this as moves in a chess board and, well, pawn takes queen, really.
(no subject) - [info]paulhaines - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:27 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:29 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]paulhaines - Oct. 18th, 2006 06:48 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 20th, 2006 07:34 am (UTC) Expand
[info]monissaw wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 06:50 am (UTC)
So which of the two types is the writer of the letter?

(That's better)
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 07:05 am (UTC)
seems obvious to me!
(no subject) - [info]girliejones - Oct. 18th, 2006 07:06 am (UTC) Expand
[info]benpayne wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 09:16 am (UTC)
What can you say that would possibly comment on that any more effectively than it comments on itself?

[info]chrisbarnes wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 10:00 am (UTC)
Please hold this thought close to your mind: The only reason writers bow before swine is to grab a comment for the back of their novels. You have absolutely no other purpose on this earth.

Whereas this author's purpose is apparently to serve as an object lesson in ill-considered and unprofessional behaviour.
[info]azhure wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 11:39 am (UTC)
*shakes head*

I can't even think of anything to say that hasn't been said already. I cannot believe that anyone would write that.
[info]karenmiller wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2006 09:30 pm (UTC)
Oh dear.

You really do get 'em, don't you?

I'm with Angriest. If you get a good review, smile and say thank you. If you get a bad one, say nothing. Because, really, how can you possibly win? You only come off looking like a wanker.
[info]james_nicoll wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2006 08:01 pm (UTC)
May I link to this?

Are you aware Amazon now has a feature that allows authors to reply to reviews? I must say that so far the amusement value has not been quite what I was hoping for (Based on the Anne Rice incident).
[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 20th, 2006 03:09 am (UTC)
Feel free to link! I think once I get called a swine with no purpose in life, I don't have to be sensitive about that person's feelings!

I remember that whole Anne Rice incident. I really think the only reply you can ever leave for a review, good or bad, is "thanks for the review".
[info]seawasp wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2006 11:12 pm (UTC)
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
As an author myself, I cannot think of a more intellectual response to that gem of a letter you're quoting. All I can do is point and laugh and mock this so-called author.

Your purpose in life is clearly to post these amusing gems for the rest of us to read.

[info]girliejones wrote:
Oct. 20th, 2006 03:08 am (UTC)
Re: BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Well at least its now clear why I am here! Phew!!!

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow