?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Puzzled

How many people does it take to say that the gender inbalance in SF outlets is a problem before it's seriously acknowledged, and accepted, as a problem?

Reasons, blame, motives, agenda, solutions and reason aside.

When is it allowed to be just ... an issue?

When will we be able to get past that discussion and start looking deeper at the more interesting aspects of it?


Comments

capnoblivious
Jan. 14th, 2009 05:35 am (UTC)
It makes sense, but these are big questions and I'm not sure I can address them to everyone's - or anyone's - satisfaction!

With Willis, I'm thinking of two stories in particular. One is "Even the Queen", which is about intergenerational relationships, and menstruation. In the intro, Willis specifically flags this as a "women's issues" story. It's a cliche and I feel like I'll be told off for saying so, but menstruation is a big flapping "this is a women's story" flag. The particular style of intergenerational relationship is a similar flag.

The other is "All My Darling Daughters", where a girl on a space station finds all the boys enslaved to small furry alien creatures with enormous human-like vaginas that squeal in human-like pain and suffering when penetrated. I read an enormous "men enjoy raping innocents" subtext to the story, which, as you might understand, I found highly offensive.

Interestingly, I've spoken to women who thought I was mad for reading that particular subtext into the story. They couldn't see my objection.

Why did I decide to read them anyway? Because I like the author, and they were in her anthology.

I don't find romance a turnoff. In fact, it's one of the reasons I like Willis' novels - she handles it well, or at least, in a way that appeals to me.

I'm definitely not the target audience for some of the things I enjoy. ... there are enough things about them that I do enjoy to keep me coming back.

And, you know, there's enough things about, say, spec-fic romances that I enjoy that keep me coming back.

But, you know, there are things where I am the target audience that I'm not interested in. It's a big world and I have a small brain. I'll follow the things I am interested in more than the things I'm not, without wishing oblivion on the things in the latter category!
monissaw
Jan. 14th, 2009 09:15 am (UTC)

You reminds me of a book I read last year, by a male writer using a female pseudonym. The (first person) narrator was a menopausal female cop with rather energetic breasts (they had a tendency to go sproing! all the time). I'd point it out as a very good example of how not to write the opposite sex. I don't know whether he was trying to give female readers something to relate to or trying to hard with the "pretending to be a woman" thing. Either way, someone needs to tell him to stop.

(Homicide, My Own, by Ann(e?) Argula, it did win some crime writing award & it is a very quick read, so it's not all bad.)
cassiphone
Jan. 14th, 2009 10:08 am (UTC)
Some men really are appallingly bad at writing women. Though I'm sure our male readers can cite equally bad examples of women writing appalling men. (snerks, the ones that read female authors, that is)

My absolute favourite is where a hint of lesbianism is thrown in for titilation rather than, say, character development purposes.
zillah975
Jan. 14th, 2009 06:00 pm (UTC)
....

"Sproing"?


I just.

Do you have a copy handy, that you can...share a quote or two? I could use a good laugh today. :)

Latest Month

March 2016
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow