girlie jones (girliejones) wrote,
girlie jones
girliejones

Ditmars

I have a mini announcement on some stuff to do with the Ditmar voting which I'll make as soon as I can.

but I wanted to point y'all who are not yet informed about a discussion group set up by punkrocker1991 to hash out and come up with some solutions to the Ditmar process. It's here: http://groups.google.com/group/ditmar-amendments2008?hl=en

He is going to moderate it, which I think is very brave, and he's written a schedule for goals that he proposes be achieved at the end of the exercise. I don't really plan to get highly involved in the process. Sure, I have opinions about the Ditmars, anyone reading here long enough will know that. And I have a record of attempting to fix problems if I can identify what's wrong with the nature of things. But actually, in this instance, I'm not sure that I am someone who should be involved in changing the guidelines. I have a vested interest in any and all outcomes of such a process and thus I think I should not be involved too highly in the nutting things out. It makes me a bit uncomfortable, to tell you the truth.

However, the very first item to be discussed is "do the guidelines need changing?" and well ... if successive adminstrators of an awards process are being made to cry, then that surely speaks for itself?
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment